Taxpayer need not Deposit penalty/ interest Amount to entertain Local Body Tax Appeals In a recent case of Bombay High Court it was ruled that deposition of penalty and interest…

The tribunal noted that crucial Supreme Court rulings on Section 80P(2)(a)(i) related to cooperative societies were overlooked by the AO and CIT(A) In a recent ruling, the Banglore bench of…

The court directed the petitioners to file the necessary tax returns for the periods preceding the cancellation of their GST registrations The Madras High Court recently issued a common order…

The tribunal noted that the Assessee had not been given adequate opportunity to present her case during the assessment proceedings, or before the CIT(A) In a recent case, the Delhi…

The tribunal found that the assessee provided a valid explanation for the delay due to partner disputes and fund withdrawal issues. The Bangalore bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (…

Considering the delay caused due to notices being sent to the wrong email ID, ITAT condoned and remanded the matter to CIT(A) The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal…

Jharkhand HC dismisses M/s Rewinder Techno Electricals’ challenge to GST ITC time limit u/s 16(4) and GSTR-3B validity under the amendment to Rule 61(5), citing recommendations from the GST Council.…

The court upheld the Tribunal's view that the reopening of proceedings was flawed, as the alleged transaction had already been disclosed in the books and in the Income Tax Return…

CESTAT observed that Aadat is nothing but a trade profit The Ahmedabad bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), allowed the appeal and held that…

The assessment was reopened via notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) Bench, Mumbai quashed the Income Tax Notice and…