In a recent ruling, the Calcutta High Court held that the GST Department cannot issue multiple notices to advocates seeking client information in connection with GST fraud investigations. The court explained that such actions violate the principle of advocate-client privilege as protected under Section 126 of the Indian Evidence Act.
The case arose when Himangshu Kumar Ray, a practicing advocate, challenged a series of notices issued to several lawyers by the GST and Anti-Fraud departments. These notices sought details of clients represented in tax matters, following an earlier order of a single judge directing authorities to investigate fake writ petitions that allegedly led to GST revenue loss.
The petitioner, who was not a party to the original writ, argued that the blanket notices were illegal and infringed on the confidentiality between lawyers and their clients. The court took note of this concern and clarified that communications between an advocate and a client are privileged unless made to commit a crime or fraud.
GST Litigation Secrets – Winning Strategies from Real Cases! Click here
The bench comprising Chief Justice T. S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya observed that the notices had been issued in a standardized format without any specific reference to individual cases or allegations.
Referring to the Supreme Court’s ruling in State of Punjab v. Sodhi Sukhdev Singh, the court explained that legal privilege protects all communications made by a client to their lawyer in the course of legitimate representation. The court further stated that such privilege is not applicable only when the communication is intended to further a criminal act.
GST Litigation Secrets – Winning Strategies from Real Cases! Click here
Upon receiving proper legal advice from the State counsel, the notices previously issued to the advocates were withdrawn through emails dated 5th June, 2023. The appeal was disposed of.