The Goods and Services Tax Network ( GSTN ) has recently unveiled the Invoice Management System (IMS), a significant addition to the GST framework set to go live on October 1, 2024. While the IMS is currently an optional facility, overlooking its implications could lead to unforeseen compliance issues and financial costs for taxpayers. This article delves into the nuances of the IMS, its legal standing, and why it is vital for businesses to pay attention. Background: A Return to GSTR-2? When the GST was first implemented in July 2017, Form GSTR-2 was introduced to facilitate the matching of purchase invoices. However, due to operational challenges, it was withdrawn after just one month. The IMS appears to be a modern iteration of this concept, aiming to streamline the process of availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) by allowing taxpayers to interact directly with the invoices uploaded by their suppliers. Are You Ready for Invoice Management 2.0? Join our live webinar now Legal Standing of the IMS The introduction of the IMS mirrors the pattern observed with other GST forms like GSTR-3B, GSTR-2A, and GSTR-2B.

These forms were initially rolled out on the GST portal, mandating taxpayer compliance, before being formally integrated into the GST legislation much later. Currently, the IMS exists as a procedural tool without explicit backing in the GST statutes. This raises questions about its legal enforceability and whether future amendments will retrospectively legitimise its requirements. It is worth monitoring how this situation unfolds. There could be legislative updates granting the IMS statutory recognition, or potential legal challenges might question its validity, leading to court rulings that could impact its application. How the IMS Works: A Dynamic GSTR-2B One of the IMS’s key features is the real-time flow of invoice information. As soon as a supplier generates an e-invoice, the details become visible in the recipient’s IMS dashboard. This eliminates the wait until the 14th of the following month to view vendor invoices, as was previously the case. Recipients can take one of three actions on each document: Accept: Confirm that the invoice details are correct. Pending: Indicate that the invoice is under review. Reject: Deny the invoice, possibly due to discrepancies.

These actions can be taken even before the supplier files their GSTR-1 return and before the generation of GSTR-2B. Once the supplier files GSTR-1, the documents are “frozen” in the IMS, forming the “default GSTR-2B.” Are You Ready for Invoice Management 2.0? Join our live webinar now Taxpayers have the flexibility to: Regenerate GSTR-2B: Based on their actions in the IMS, taxpayers can regenerate their GSTR-2B to include only “Accepted” and “No Action” invoices, excluding those marked as “Rejected” or “Pending.” Modify Actions: Changes can be made in the IMS until the taxpayer files their GSTR-3B return, allowing for adjustments in ITC claims. If no action is taken in the IMS, all invoices are deemed accepted and flow into GSTR-2B, similar to the current system. Implications for Taxpayers At first glance, the IMS might seem like an optional tool with minimal impact if ignored. However, there are potential risks: 1. Automated Notices:

The GST system may generate notices for discrepancies between supplier and recipient records, especially if IT systems incorporate stringent logic checks. 2. Input Tax Credit Risks: Failing to address mismatches proactively could result in denied ITC claims or future disputes during audits. 3. Compliance Burden: Ignoring the IMS now might lead to a steeper learning curve later, as the system becomes more integrated into GST compliance processes. Are You Ready for Invoice Management 2.0? Join our live webinar now What Should Taxpayers Do? To navigate the IMS effectively, taxpayers should consider the following steps: 1. Implement Robust Reconciliation Systems Establish systems capable of document-level matching of invoices. This ensures that every invoice from a supplier is accounted for and any discrepancies are identified promptly. 2. Proactive Communication with Suppliers In cases of mismatches or discrepancies: Notify Suppliers Early: Inform suppliers of any issues before they file GSTR-1, allowing them to make corrections. Collaborate on Resolutions:

Work together to resolve discrepancies, ensuring accurate ITC claims. 3. Manage Credit Notes Effectively Maintain a comprehensive record of all credit notes issued by suppliers. Since the IMS only allows for “Accept” or “Reject” actions on credit notes, accurate tracking is essential to prevent ITC errors. 4. Monitor Supplier Actions Suppliers can view the recipient’s actions on invoices through their own IMS portal. This transparency facilitates: Timely Corrections: Suppliers can amend their GSTR-1 or use GSTR-1A (if GSTR-3B hasn’t been filed) based on recipient feedback. Improved Accuracy: Reduces the likelihood of discrepancies and subsequent compliance issues. Stay Informed and Train Staff Regular Updates: Keep abreast of GSTN advisories and legal changes related to the IMS. Staff Training: Ensure that the finance and accounting teams understand how to use the IMS effectively. Keeping up the pace with IMS While the IMS introduces an additional layer of compliance, it also offers an opportunity to enhance the accuracy of ITC claims and reduce the risk of disputes. By engaging with the IMS proactively, taxpayers can: Improve Financial Accuracy: Ensure that ITC claims are based on accurate and verified invoices.

Reduce Compliance Risks: Minimise the likelihood of receiving notices or facing penalties due to mismatches. Are You Ready for Invoice Management 2.0? Join our live webinar now Enhance Supplier Relationships: Collaborate effectively with suppliers to maintain smooth business operations. In the evolving landscape of GST compliance, staying informed and adapting to new systems like the IMS is not just advisable—it is absolutely essential. Ignoring the IMS might save time in the short term but could lead to costly consequences down the line. Taxpayers should consider adopting the IMS sooner rather than later to stay ahead of compliance requirements and safeguard their financial interests.